The CASCO does not measure what your company has already done on sustainability. It measures how exposed it is to regulations that have yet to enter into force — before they become real contractual and operational risks.
Instruments such as EcoVadis, B Corp and GRI measure present environmental and social performance. They are outcome tests. CASCO measures something different: prospective vulnerability — how positioned a company is (or is not) to meet the demands of the European Green Deal over the next 2 to 5 years.
The finding that gave rise to CASCO: Richemont — with a GRI report verified by external auditors — scored 28% on CASCO. Inditex, frequently criticised for the scale of its production, scored 74%. ESG performance and regulatory preparedness are orthogonal dimensions.
Think of it as preventive medicine: a check-up that identifies where a company is vulnerable before the regulator or the client demands compliance.
Each domain is anchored in current or pending mandatory legislative text. The weights reflect current regulatory intensity for the European textile sector.
The E0–E3 adjustment system prevents statements of intent or ESG marketing from artificially inflating the regulatory preparedness score.
Cases were built from public documents (annual reports, sustainability policies, GRI reports) and empirically validated in the academic research that originated the CASCO.
Richemont has a sustainability report verified by external auditors to the GRI standard. Inditex is frequently criticised for the scale of its fast-fashion production. Yet CASCO measures a completely different dimension: specific preparedness for European Green Deal regulations — ESPR, DPP, CSDDD, textile CSRD. Inditex invested in the digital and operational infrastructure these regulations require. Richemont, focused on the luxury market, did not prioritise this dimension. ESG performance and regulatory preparedness are orthogonal dimensions.
The case studies above were developed exclusively to validate the CASCO methodology, using publicly available information at the time of the analysis (2024). The results represent a specific point in time and do not constitute a permanent, current or official assessment of the companies mentioned. Subsequent changes to internal policies, processes, documentation, sustainability practices or regulatory compliance may significantly alter the outcome if the methodology were reapplied. CASCO is a regulatory exposure diagnostic tool — it does not replace independent audits or certifications, and does not constitute an official compliance opinion.
Complete the diagnostic tool and receive your prospective regulatory vulnerability score based on your company's public documents.
Start CASCO Assessment